<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicken Around the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/7122/chicken-around-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/7122/chicken-around-the-world/</link>
	<description>Smart Thinking for the Smart Enterprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Foydel</title>
		<link>http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/7122/chicken-around-the-world/#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Foydel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightlog.sightlinesconsulting.com/?p=141#comment-3799</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more Naomi. Job, Position and Grade blocks are all part of the organization as it was modeled in the 1970s-1980s. It&#039;s now virtually impossible for these to have any meaning in today&#039;s fluid, changing organizations. And yes, Workday and NetSuite have both avoided the accounting code block, but I know that NetSuite takes a hit for it from some in the market who think that a code block is a necessity - many of whom are, not surprisingly, CPAs. I think, judging by some of the defense of their system that I have heard, Workday also hears the same disbelief. Eventually we will convince these folks that it is a better world without such phony contraints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more Naomi. Job, Position and Grade blocks are all part of the organization as it was modeled in the 1970s-1980s. It&#8217;s now virtually impossible for these to have any meaning in today&#8217;s fluid, changing organizations. And yes, Workday and NetSuite have both avoided the accounting code block, but I know that NetSuite takes a hit for it from some in the market who think that a code block is a necessity &#8211; many of whom are, not surprisingly, CPAs. I think, judging by some of the defense of their system that I have heard, Workday also hears the same disbelief. Eventually we will convince these folks that it is a better world without such phony contraints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naomi Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/7122/chicken-around-the-world/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Naomi Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sightlog.sightlinesconsulting.com/?p=141#comment-3783</guid>
		<description>Check out Workday financials.  There is no code block.  It&#039;s handled with tags, good old 2.0 tags.  By the way, in HRM, the ERPs are equally confining because once you&#039;ve set up your job code structure, not unlike your code block, there&#039;s so much tied to it that changing it can be life-threatening.  And we haven&#039;t even talked about earnings types.  Or was that infotypes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Workday financials.  There is no code block.  It&#8217;s handled with tags, good old 2.0 tags.  By the way, in HRM, the ERPs are equally confining because once you&#8217;ve set up your job code structure, not unlike your code block, there&#8217;s so much tied to it that changing it can be life-threatening.  And we haven&#8217;t even talked about earnings types.  Or was that infotypes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.002 seconds using apc
Object Caching 345/346 objects using apc

Served from: www.enterpriseirregulars.com @ 2012-02-11 19:49:43 -->
