• Home
  • Blog
  • Meet the Enterprise Irregulars
  • Contact
  • Sponsors
Enterprise Irregulars
Smart Thinking for the Smart Enterprise
  • Featured Posts
  • Business
  • Technology / Software
  • Trends & Concepts
  • Enterprise News

AdSense

Google Adwords and SEO: Beware of the Fraudsters

Google Adwords and SEO: Beware of the Fraudsters

By Tom Foydel on August 29, 2011

Most of you probably already know this, but I thought it worth mentioning here that SEO fraud appears to be increasing rapidly, along with Google Adwords fraud. Businesses across the spectrum are anxious, to say the least, to increase business. This might be one reason that the amount of daily calls, emails and other detritus [...]

Posted in Featured Posts, Technology / Software | Tagged AdSense, AdWords, E-Commerce, Fraud, google, netsuite, NetSuite and NetSuite Consulting, SEO, Technology for the Small to Medium Enterprise | 20 Responses

Silly Rabbits:  Google is for Spam not for Search

Silly Rabbits: Google is for Spam not for Search

By Bob Warfield on January 10, 2011

I’m watching with some interest the growing meme about Google passing on too much spam in the search results. Mathew Ingram does a good overview while claiming Google is on a collision course with Demand Media.  He mentions: –  Paul Kedrosky’s rant –  Vivek Wadhwa, who says we desperately need a new and better Google -  [...]

Posted in Business, Featured Posts | Tagged AdSense, advertising, AdWords, Bing, Blekko, Demand Media, google, marketing, search, SEO | 2 Responses

Google's Economic Impact : Next Time It Will Look Different

Google’s Economic Impact : Next Time It Will Look Different

By Sadagopan on May 31, 2010

Google published the first ever “Google’s Economic Impact” report, which estimates that in 2009, Google generated $54 billion of economic activity for advertisers, publishers, and non-profit bodies in the United States. This is done using the AdSense & AdWords frameworks and delivered via paid search clicks, natural search clicks, AdSense revenue sharing, and Google Grants aka charitable donations. The report reveals that Google’s US revenue in 2009 was $11 billion; the $54 billion figure is Google’s computation on how much value Google creates for its partners. The methodology http://goo.gl/dj9B used therein is quite a pioneering one, given that this is the first time that someone is attempting to assess the economic impact of online ads at this scale : the whole internet and who else is better qualified than Google to attempt this.

This is an interesting report, the implications of which will be felt more and more in the years to come. If we reason out that search engines (Google)are in many senses replacing displacing traditional media ad spends, it may be difficult to agree with Google’s $54 billion estimate for its direct economic impact but we have to concede a few things. This is a new growing media, the media, by nature brings in more participation from new class of users and one that may be potentially more ready to spend and the flexibility this provides to advertisers – they can cap daily ad spend and can look at in realtime extending or suspending ads based on clicks and reach. Google’s report primarily depends on the assumption that clicks on natural results drive five times as many leads for businesses as clicks on paid results. However, we believe the indirect impact may be much much more.

I have seen estimates suggesting that Google’s Traffic Acquisition Cost payments to US publisher websites, (as assessed by analysts) at about $3 billion, for an revenue of 11 billion dollars which is now being projected by Google to have an advertiser impact of about $50 plus billion. Lets look at the calculation :
Google calculates the advertiser impact of its search service by assuming that for every dollar spent by an advertiser, the advertiser generates two dollars in sales (and one dollar in “sales minus marketing expense”, which the report calls “profits”) from consumers clicking on the purchased search result, and a further seven dollars in “profits” from consumers clicking on natural search results for the same advertiser, creating an 8X multiplier effect. Thus, claims the report, $7 billion in US-owned and operated revenue should drive $56 billion in economic impact

Now the difficult part:
– Google says that businesses receive an average of five clicks on search results for companies as ads, and by its own conservative standards, estimates that search clicks are about 70 percent as commercially relevant and valuable as ad clicks, and thereby calculates that advertisers receive a total of eight times in surplus what they spend in AdWords. Look carefully here:

– Google assumes that people clicking on links are as inclined to purchase. Any benefit from link clicks has nothing at all to do with having ads. The two are separate events, and a company gets the benefit from search engine optimization and all the work of having a Web site, rapidly increasing the effective cost of using the ads.

– As the Jansen and Spink study states, “More than 80% of web queries are informational in nature and approximately 10% aretransactional, and 10% navigational.” This may lead one to think that the vast majority of clicks need not convert into sales (this is understandable) and so the impact may be less than what is assumed herein.

Thinking deep, it occurs to me it would be tough to embrace or discard Google’s estimated multiplier effect .As noted earlier, Google calculates the advertiser impact of its search service by assuming that for every dollar spent by an advertiser, the advertiser generates one dollar in “sales minus marketing expense” from consumers clicking on the purchased search result, and a further seven dollars from consumers clicking on natural search results for the same advertiser, creating an 8X multiplier effect. Google estimates that one dollar spent on search generates two dollars in advertiser sales via consumer clicks on paid search results. This assessment is centered on the methodology devised by Hal Varian, its Chief Economist, which in its core, assumes that advertisers are spending rationally to buy a certain keyword ranking rather than a higher or lower ranking, and then deriving the implied value which advertisers place on a click. I would think that this resonates well with my intuitive reasoning. Google estimates that one dollar spent on search corresponds to seven dollars in advertiser revenue via consumer clicks on natural search results.

Ideally , Google should have attempted a Lifetime Value assessment to derive the economic impact but rightfuly chooses to center these on transaction basis given the characteristics of the internet media and its limited lifespan. I talked to a few power users of these services (corporate and SMB) and find that for many interenet centric revenue generators, the proportion of their online centric revenue coming out of search engines on an average hover around upwards of 20% in their established and growing phase of business. The informal estimates from such sources point to 40-20-40 ratio – direct traffic,keyword centric and natural search referrals. For startups and early life enterprises, the ratio could be 25-35-40 pointing to a near 6X ratio. The swing across the range hovers between 4x to 6x ratio.

Without search engine, Google acknowledges advertisers would find other means of reaching consumers. We have to concede that search engines are not just merely capturing existing consumer spending rather they stimulate additional consumer spending(any online purchaser can vouch for this – they tend to buy more , owing to the dramatic increase in efficiencies and the smoothness of the operation). To be fair, Google’s true “economic impact” on a community should likely be measured in a way that balances the economic patterns it disrupts with the new-model of business it generates. Online ads and Google being the dominant player there are directly influencing the sale and retail mechanisms in a big way and are bound to increase their influence and hopefully, we will see the economic impact assessment methods improve a lot more along with the results.

Posted in Business, Featured Posts | Tagged AdSense, Emerging Trends, google | 1 Response

feed mail facebook twitter linkedin

Sponsor Posts

The Next Revolution for Finance -- Embedded Analytics
The Next Revolution for Finance -- Embedded Analytics
Understanding the Magic Quadrant\
Understanding the Magic Quadrant\'s New Name
7 B2B Strategies for LinkedIn Marketing
7 B2B Strategies for LinkedIn Marketing
HR Tech Vendors: Who’s Out There?
HR Tech Vendors: Who’s Out There?
  • Tags
  • Calendar
  • Comments

analytics apple Ariba BPM BPO Cloud Cloud Computing collaboration CRM Current Affairs Enterprise 2.0 enterprise applications enterprise apps Enterprise apps strategy Enterprise Irregulars enterprise software erp Facebook gartner google ibm innovation iPad iPhone marketing microsoft mobile netsuite oracle procurement R "Ray" Wang; rwang0 SaaS salesforce.com sap social business Social CRM Social Media software as a service startups strategy supply chain technology Twitter workday

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
  • Bruce: Great post and very true..
  • Bruce: That was a slam dunk… marketing/pr...
  • Bruce: Good to read about increase in M&A...
  • Enterprise Irregulars (blog) ← SAPfreelances.com: ...
  • lateral thinking: 10 Ways Cloud Computing Is...
  • V3.co.uk ← SAPfreelances.com: his opening...
  • Susan Bilder: Manufacturing companies need to...
  • Enterprise Irregulars: for manufacturing, SAP...
  • SAPHANA: Guys Mail me on graspsaphana@gmail.com...
  • Forums Are Key to a Good Customer Experience • Vanilla Forums Blog: ...

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Authors

  • Anshu Sharma
  • Basab Pradhan
  • Bob Warfield
  • Brian Sommer
  • Charlie Wood
  • Chris Selland
  • Craig Cmehil
  • David Dobrin
  • David Terrar
  • Denis Pombriant
  • Dennis Moore
  • Dion Hinchcliffe
  • Esteban Kolsky
  • Evangelos Simoudis
  • James Governor
  • Jason Busch
  • Jason Corsello
  • Jason M. Lemkin
  • Jeff Nolan
  • Jevon MacDonald
  • John Taschek
  • Jon Reed
  • Louis Columbus
  • Maggie Fox
  • Merv Adrian
  • Michael Fauscette
  • Michael Krigsman
  • Naomi Bloom
  • Nenshad Bardoliwalla
  • Niel Robertson
  • Paul Greenberg
  • Phil Fersht
  • Phil Wainewright
  • R "Ray" Wang
  • Ross Mayfield
  • Sadagopan
  • Sameer Patel
  • Sandy Kemsley
  • Sig Rinde
  • Steve Mann
  • Susan Scrupski
  • Thomas Otter
  • Tom Foydel
  • Tom Raftery
  • Vinnie Mirchandani
  • Zoli Erdos
Sponsored by: