In my first column tackling the latest from Chicago-based VMS provider Fieldglass last week, I provided an overview of a number of the gaps they recently filled from a reporting, analytics, visualization and benchmarking perspective in their solution. But I was not alone in having an opinion on the subject — I also appreciated the reader comment that provided some additional color around how other providers stack up in this regard as well. Today, I’ll continue this analysis, providing some concrete examples of how companies can leverage the enhanced analytics capabilities of providers like Fieldglass to make better contingent staffing decisions that save money and time while driving to better levels of supplier performance. Let’s begin.
Articles in this series
- Update: Fieldglass
- FieldGlass Doubles Down on BI and Contingent Spend (Part 2)
- Fieldglass: Doubling Down on Analytics to Drive Contingent Spend Savings (Part 1)